![]() Moreover, resolving interference tasks not only requires one to solve and think logically, but also it is an important ability to use previous experience and knowledge. Both tasks require processes such as representing information, attending to relevant information and inhibiting premature responses. The interference tasks require similar processes to be solved as those involved in the Matrices test of intelligence (fluid intelligence). It is well-known that IQ, both fluid and crystallized intelligence is positively associated with some cognitive control processes ( Detterman and Daniel, 1989 Duncan, 2000 Klingberg et al., 2005 Checa and Rueda, 2011 Duan and Shi, 2011 Rueda et al., 2012). The common key to these tasks is that the participants must filter out interfering information as quickly as possible. These abilities are often measured by laboratory tasks such as the Stroop and Flanker tests. Furthermore, impulsivity could be considered as the consequence of dysfunctional inhibitory processes and strong impulses (premature execution of the response) and is modulated by dispositional and situational variables ( Hofmann et al., 2009). Interference suppression, i.e., filtering out interfering information, is a process that requires sustained attention in order to process relevant information and ignore irrelevant information. Two important cognitive control abilities are filtering out interfering information and controlling impulsiveness. Generally, Vocabulary and Verbal tests are used as a measure of this aspect of intelligence ( Cattell and Raymond, 1963 Sternberg, 1999, 2005). On the other hand, crystallized intelligence depends on experience and knowledge and it could be defined as the ability to use these factors. These tests are designed to reduce the influence of culture, educational level and verbal comprehension. It is measured by a non-verbal test that requires abstract reasoning, such as a Matrices test. It is independent of the acquired knowledge. Fluid intelligence refers to the capacity to solve and think logically about novel problems. The IQ is commonly divided into two factors: fluid and crystallized intelligence. ![]() The relation between intelligence quotient (IQ) and cognitive control skills is well established ( Blair, 2006 Shamosh and Gray, 2008). Limitations and implications of these results are also discussed. These results suggest that not only is IQ crucial, but also competences related to EI are essential to human cognitive control processes. However, the Managing Emotions dimension of EI measured by the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), but not self-reported of EI, negatively correlates with the impulsivity index, the premature execution of the response. Results show a negative correlation between IQ and the interference suppression index, the ability to inhibit processing of irrelevant information. The aim of this study is to examine the relation between IQ and EI, and cognitive control abilities evaluated by a typical laboratory control cognitive task, the Stroop task. By contrast, there is a debate about the role of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in individuals' cognitive control abilities. Several studies have shown that IQ correlates with cognitive control abilities, such as interference suppression, as measured with experimental tasks like the Stroop and Flanker tasks. The relationship between intelligence quotient (IQ) and cognitive control processes has been extensively established. ![]() 2Department of Basic Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Science, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.Purificación Checa 1 * and Pablo Fernández-Berrocal 2
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |